Live Blog - Bruins @ Rangers
Here we go with Round 2 of the live blog. Today is an absolute must win for the Blueshirts. They simply cannot afford to lose both games of a home and home to a Bruins team so depleted by the flu bug, that the Wolf Pack could probably beat them.
The key for the Rangers today? Well, here’s a little quote from Sean Avery that should make it clear: “I don’t know why. But I’ve been saying this for a while. We need to look at ourselves personally in the mirror and hold ourselves accountable. ”
Accountability? Hmmm…where have you heard that before?? The Rangers must be held accountable for what they do today and moving forward to have any chance at making a run.
Everybody will dress in warm-ups except for Marcel Hossa. That means Jason Strudwick’s probably back in the line-up, while fan favorite Marek Malik will probably sit. As much as it pains me that Strudwick is the only other option, you can’t argue with Renney’s decision to give Malik a seat after yesterday.
12:40 p.m.: Almost four minutes in and no penalties thus far for the Rangers. Heck of a start!
12:49 p.m.: Another great job by the hard working third line drawing a penalty and almost scoring. Let’s shoot the puck on the PP now!
12:52 p.m.: No goal on the man-up, but I was happy with the power play. They put the puck at the net and had opportunities off rebounds. You will score more time than not when you execute a power play like that.
12:57 p.m.: That’s the right call on Girardi.
1:01 p.m.: Another PP opportunity. They need another power play like the first one.
1:06 p.m.: That’s a bad bad goal. The Rangers have played a fine period so far and that just cancels it out. Lundy’s gotta have that and Tyutin can’t allow that puck out of the zone. Bad job all around.
1:10 p.m.: The Rangers outshot Boston 12-4 in that period and really had the better of the play. The third line looks great again and Avery’s going well. But the only thing that matters is again the Rangers are trailing and, again, they have to find a way to come from behind. The only way to do that is to keep at it for the next forty minutes. They can’t afford to take a period off as they have in so many games the past few weeks.
1:35 p.m.: Another great shift by the third liners. That hard work needs to be rewared by Renney.
1:37 p.m.: That is an awful awful call on Gomez. It’s really unbelievable the amount of terrible calls that have gone agains the Rangers lately. It’s unfortunate timing. The Rangers have been pressing for the last 10 minutes or so, and this kills that momentum. Gotta kill it off.
1:44 p.m.: This is getting ridiculous. The Rangers are dominating the play, but just can’t score. The next goal will be crucial. If the Rangers get it they’re obviously tied and will have some positive reinforcement for their play so far. If the B’s get it I think its game over. The Rangers can’t afford to dominate two periods and be down two goals.
1:55 p.m.: The Rangers HAVE TO shoot the puck in that situation. The third line kept the puck in the Boston zone for a good minute plus and have nothing to show for it.
1:56 p.m.: Ah yes…the classic “Jagr” penalty.
2:01 p.m.: Frustrating, just frustrating. The Rangers have DOMINATED this game and are still trailing at the 2nd period break. It has to be disheartening for a team to play so well and still be down. This third period is going to determine a lot for this team. One of these big name guys on the team has to step up and earn his keep. This can’t be a game won by the third line neophytes. I want to see Jagr, Drury, Shanny, or Gomez step up and make it happen. If the Rangers drop this one it may be time to seriously start considering if they should be sellers at the deadline.
2:22 p.m.: That’s it, game over. The Rangers aren’t scoring two goals in this game, probably not even one. They just flat out got outworked on that shift. The only difference, when Boston outworks them they score. When the Rangers outwork the opponent, nothing happens.
2:27 p.m.: Rangers PP. This is their last chance to get something going.
2:33 p.m.: The boo-birds are out in full force right now, as well they should be. That was an absolutely awful power play. Something big has to happen with this team and soon.
2:34 p.m.: HOW THE HECK IS THE FOURTH LINE ON THE ICE RIGHT NOW! SERIOUSLY MR. RENNEY, YOU ARE DOWN TWO GOALS IN PROBABLY THE BIGGEST GAME OF THE YEAR AND YOU PUT OUT A LINE THAT WILL NOT SCORE. REAL SMART!
2:48 p.m.: Wow…just wow. Mara shouldn’t play in the next game after that turnover. That’s a turnover a squirt doesn’t make. This team is a joke right now, an absolute joke. The big guys are just non-existent. At this point a fire sale may be necessary. I’d much rather see 20 young guys playing their tails off and losing, then a bunch of under-motivated vets with big names get embarrassed. Time to shake things up Glen.
2:51 p.m.: At least that line can get something. They’re the only one’s that seem to care. And did you guys see Thomas on that goal. Geez, man relax. I understand the shutout’s gone, but you’re getting the ‘W’.
3:04 p.m.: Renney needs to get mad and yell during this press conference…
This entry is filed under Blog Entries. Subscribe to the
Comments RSS feed.
Tags: Bruins, Live Blog, Steven Gelbs






12 Responses
Larry Rothman January 20th at 12:52 pm
Finally getting to see a game outside of Greenwich. Thinking of a song titled “Thank God for the Bruins”. Blueshirts need to score on the PP’s. Good pressure, no points.
Larry Rothman January 20th at 12:54 pm
Nice check by Dawes
Larry Rothman January 20th at 1:01 pm
Good penalty kill on a lousy call on Garardi. Now Rangers go 1 up. Time to score.
Larry Rothman January 20th at 1:10 pm
Lazy play by Tutin. Didn’t play the man or the puck
Chris January 20th at 3:01 pm
I agree with your comment from about 248. . .what was wrong with the plan of giving contracts to one or two free agents a year and bringing up guys that were ready from the farm. . .we’ve got decent defensemen like Pock sitting in Hartford, who sure as hell won’t clear waivers and we have to watch overpaid junk like Mara and Malik skate around like they’re in a production of High School Musical on Ice. . .if these contracts weren’t so bad we might be able to get rid of some of these guys. . .
Steven January 20th at 3:08 pm
Absolutely agree Chris. At what point over the last 10 years has bringing in the big name free agents worked out? Shanny worked last year and that’s pretty much it. Chemistry and hard work may be more important in hockey then in any other sport and thats what these kids bring. Case in point is the Dawes/Dubinsky/Prucha line. Wouldn’t it be great to see four of those-type lines just be absolutely relentless for a full sixty minutes?
Inferno January 20th at 3:20 pm
Steve,
Thats why my “how to fix the rangers” article was written the way it was written
im talking about the legit one, not the funny one.
Step 1: Get a true #6 defenseman. see if that fixes the team, if not, goto step 2.
Step 2: Fire Renney. see if that fixes the team, if not, goto step 3.
Step 3: Firesale at the trade deadline. see if that fixes the team, if not, goto step 4.
Step 4: Sign Adam Banks (I really should have added this one… hehehe)
Steven January 20th at 3:30 pm
Inferno, I’m not gonna lie. The Adam Banks thing probably would have put your’s over the top. All jokes aside, I think we’re all in agreement now. I think it goes beyond Step 1, because I really believe that the true problem right now is the big guys are playing small and have been all season. I don’t know what you want to chalk that up to, but since I do think these guys want to perform, I’m chalking it up to just a complete lack of chemistry. We see it all the time in sports…the teams that should win on paper, not necessarily doing so.
It’s now about 2/3 into the season and the chemistry just clearly isn’t there. So a move needs to be made to hopefully snap some chemistry into this team. The current construction just flat out won’t win.
Inferno January 20th at 3:36 pm
Thats where i kinda disagree with you steve. it seems like you want to make a big move (say swapping jagr and a pick to atlanta for marian hossa) to try to snap this team out of it. but to me that just compounds the problem. its the “band aid” approach we saw during the decade of despair where the team was on the verge of making the playoffs, but couldnt do it despite adding more and more high profile names, and then had nothing to show for a mediocre year in terms of a high draft pick.
i say try to fix the team with a small move, then a coaching change. if that doesnt work, you go into all out sell mode.
lets not try to fix an unfixable situation, instead lets try to solve the core problem of this team, and it is slow, lazy, and old players which are killing us. we need to get bigger, stronger, younger, and faster. and we arent getting that way through trades, i think you need to build through the draft to get the way you want to.
Steven January 20th at 3:39 pm
No inferno, we’re on the same page. I’m not looking for a big name for a big name, but more of an addition by subtraction. I think if you can move Jagr for a couple of prospects and draft picks you do it. You then recall Callahan from the AHL and give him a spot that’s opened up by the trading of Jagr.
To bring in another big name would just compound the chemistry problem.
Inferno January 20th at 3:46 pm
If you can get the same value now, as you could during the trade deadline, then I wholeheartedly agree bro. Trade Jagr, and anyone else who is playing like crap. But the key part there is to get the true value back. Despite Jagr playing poorly this year, he is still worth at least a first rounder, a 2nd rounder, and a very high ranking prospect to a team legitimately in the run (I think he would be great on San Jose to be honest).
If the Sharks offered me their first this year, their 2nd this year (or next year), and Logan Couture or Nick Petrecki, I would jump at the chance to make that trade.
But I am not moving him for a marginal 3rd liner, and a 3rd rounder. That is not getting back equal value.
Steven January 20th at 3:56 pm
100% correct