Comments on: Adam Graves Number To Be Retired http://www.nyrangerscast.com/blog/2008/01/24/adam-graves-number-to-be-retired/ Two die-hard NY Rangers fans host a popular fan-based podcast and accompanying blog Sat, 04 Sep 2010 05:38:21 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: UB Bull http://www.nyrangerscast.com/blog/2008/01/24/adam-graves-number-to-be-retired/comment-page-1/#comment-88 UB Bull Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:34:48 +0000 http://www.nyrangerscast.com/blog/2008/01/24/adam-graves-number-to-be-retired/#comment-88 I have no problem with retiring 9 for Adam Graves. However, the Rangers do not seem to have any memory from before 1970. If they are going to retire number 9 what about also retiring it for the great Andy Bathgate. Also while they are in the process of retiring numbers how about number 3 for Harry Howell, who was next to Graves when Leetch made the announcement? I have no problem with retiring 9 for Adam Graves. However, the Rangers do not seem to have any memory from before 1970. If they are going to retire number 9 what about also retiring it for the great Andy Bathgate. Also while they are in the process of retiring numbers how about number 3 for Harry Howell, who was next to Graves when Leetch made the announcement?

]]>